The Celestial source of Cyrillic
Sergei S. Robaten - Trinity Academy
The Celestial source of Cyrillic
Sergei S. Robaten - Russian Academy of Trinitarism
Modern sources of generally accessible information (Wikipedia) contain propaganda that Russian writing is adopted.
In general, this is the accepted opinion of academic institutes and orthodox specialists about Russian writing.
Greek teachers brought their writing and knowledge to Rus’ from Byzantium, they themselves adopted all of it from the Jews, and the Jews – from the Phoenicians. The Phoenicians are an ancient Semitic people, closely related to Jews. In this manner, there is a closed circle of primary sources for what now exists as the alphabet, originating from Semitic peoples.
However, letters are not potatoes, and they cannot be adopted casually, as when quenching the physical needs of the body. If a need arises for the appropriation of graphic symbols, then it is to quench a spiritual need. Graphic symbols are necessary in and of themselves, but rather they serve as a means to transfer ideas, moreover religious ones, and are used first and foremost for the writing of sacred books containing these religious ideas and teachings.
How could the Jews, having personally received the revelation of God from Moses, adopt letters to write about that most important event, singular in the history of humanity, from pagans – the Phoenicians and Babylonian Aramaeans, worshipers of Vaal?
Side note: Baal comes from Baal-guru - teachers from the Sun?
However, the suitability of Phoenician letters (called Daats) for writing of the holiest of holies does not raise any doubts among the modern theologians from the Jerusalem Museum of Books.
In the culture of modern Israel, it is a commonly accepted fact that the Jews adopted their old as well as new graphic system from other peoples who are no longer in existence. This means that the adoption of a basic complex of religious ideas by practitioners of modern Judaism from other peoples, possibly closely related to them, and for the preservation of which suitable letters were demanded. In this case, we are concerned with the ideas written in the quadratic Aramaic script, i.e. the Tora, Тanakh, and Talmud, as a minimum.
In this manner, the authorship of Christian cultural achievements written in the aforementioned sacred books belongs to people of a more ancient era than the biblical one described in the Scriptures. The graphemes used for writing sacred Jewish texts called Aramaic in the Large Soviet Encyclopedia, naturally have a name in Hebrew, ktrav ashuri, which translates as Assyrian script. This circumstance undoubtedly establishes the fact that the graphemes ofModern Hebrew were adopted, and it also means that the main religious ideas written with these graphemes not only belong to thinkers of another era, but also full well could have been significantly altered without the knowledge of the authors.
To establish the possible primary source of graphemes suitable for the writing of sacred texts, we are left to search for a source ofreligious views as authoritative for theologians of any religion, modern as well as ancient, who needed a system of symbols suitable for writing their intrinsic truths. This requirement implies a non-random selection of graphemes by the theologians of antiquity who felt a requirement towrite about their spiritual enlightenment. Moreover, graphemes should correspond to the level of sanctity of the text and they themselves should have been unquestionably authoritative for their initial readers.
From this point of view, we will consider the Phoenician script system. Phoenician letters have names that are well known. The Wikipedia article “Phoenician writing” gives the names of these letters. For example: stick, driver, hook, house, door, palm, snake.
There is nothing wrong with these names, however, they do not constitute anything spiritual in their summation. The first theologian naturally wrote the first book about God, and could not think in base, mundane comparisons or use images close to the everyday circumstances of a goatherd to record his innermost knowledge. This conclusion constitutes a presupposition for further conclusions. We will search for images of graphemes beyond the realm of mundane objects. The most suitable place for such searches is the firmament, where there certainly can be nothing ignoble.
To constrict the field of search, we turn to a heavenly phenomenon that in modern times is not easily accessible for observation.
This is the central luminary of our galaxy.
The reason why the center of the earth cannot be seen in modern times from the earth is considered to be thick clouds of cosmic dust, which absorb the light of the Central Sun of our galaxy. This luminary has the same power and brightness as analogous centers of other galaxies. The thickness of the dust clouds is not uniform everywhere and there are localized patches of daylight, for example Baade’s Window, through which it is very probably that our ancestors could have observed the radiance of the Central Sun with their own eyes, without relying the use ofmodern technology of x-ray and other radiation spectrums invisible to the human.
Currently, the distant spiral galaxy М83 is considered that the most similar to our own galaxy of the Milky Way. Its representation will be used for further analys
Read all -->
No comments:
Post a Comment